{"id":442,"date":"2025-03-04T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2025-03-04T13:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.hudsonpcrepair.com\/?p=442"},"modified":"2025-03-08T16:53:22","modified_gmt":"2025-03-08T16:53:22","slug":"gtm-136-how-asana-calendly-scaled-plg-to-slg-playbooks-that-work-jessica-gilmartin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.hudsonpcrepair.com\/index.php\/2025\/03\/04\/gtm-136-how-asana-calendly-scaled-plg-to-slg-playbooks-that-work-jessica-gilmartin\/","title":{"rendered":"GTM 136: How Asana & Calendly Scaled: PLG to SLG Playbooks That Work | Jessica Gilmartin"},"content":{"rendered":"
The GTM Podcast is available on any major directory, including:<\/p>\n
Jessica Gilmartin<\/a> has nearly 20 years of go-to-market leadership experience, most recently serving as both the Chief Revenue Officer and Chief Marketing Officer at Calendly. Prior to that, she led marketing teams at an impressive array of companies, including Asana. As the cherry on top, Jessica also built and sold a successful frozen yogurt chain in San Francisco.<\/p>\n Taking an entrepreneurial approach to ownership in an organization<\/p>\n<\/li>\n The difficulty of selling to both mid-market and enterprise customers<\/p>\n<\/li>\n Cultivating a culture of creativity and approachability<\/p>\n<\/li>\n How to hire your first marketer<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n If you missed GTM 135, check it out here: <\/strong>How Marketing Creates Million-Dollar Exits: 6 SaaS Success Stories | Katrina Wong<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n 06:29 How Asana moved from product-led growth to sales-led growth<\/p>\n 18:00 Why refining your ICP is paramount for product-led growth<\/p>\n 33:37 Fostering a culture of experimentation<\/p>\n 40:23 Hiring your first marketer as a startup founder<\/p>\n Guest Speaker Links (Jessica Gilmartin):<\/strong><\/p>\n LinkedIn: https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/jessicagilmartin\/<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n Host Speaker Links (Scott Barker):<\/strong><\/p>\n LinkedIn: https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/ssbarker\/<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n Newsletter: https:\/\/thegtmnewsletter.substack.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n Where to find GTMnow (GTMfund\u2019s media brand):<\/strong><\/p>\n Website: https:\/\/gtmnow.com\/<\/a><\/p>\n LinkedIn: https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/gtmnow\/<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n The GTM Podcast (on all major directories): https:\/\/gtmnow.com\/tag\/podcast\/<\/a><\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n Sponsor: Pursuit<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n The best talent isn\u2019t actively job hunting. Pursuit helps companies hire elite go-to-market talent on a non-retainer basis<\/em>. As a key GTMfund partner, they equip sales and marketing teams with top performers.<\/p>\n If you\u2019re hiring for sales or marketing roles, reach out to Pursuit<\/a> at pursuitsalessolutions.com\/gtm<\/a> or message a GTMfund team member.<\/p>\n The GTM Podcast<\/strong> Scott Barker:<\/strong> Hello and welcome back everyone to the GTM podcast as always. It\u2019s your host, Scott Barker, and we really appreciate you lending us your eardrums for the [00:03:00] next 45 minutes or an hour or so, uh, we have a fantastic guest lined up, I am joined by Jessica Gilmartin, Jessica, welcome,<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> Thank you very much. Happy to be here.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> excited to have you, and there\u2019s a lot I want to get through, um, but really quickly, just for the listeners, uh, a quick bio. So Jessica has nearly 20 years of go to market leadership experience. Uh, most recently as the CRO and CMO, uh, simultaneously at, uh, Calendly, uh, we all probably use Calendly in our day to day lives.<\/p>\n Um, and then previous to that, she was the head of revenue marketing at Asana. So two incredible companies. And then the CMO of Honor as well, which is one of the largest privately owned home care companies in the U. S. And I thought this was cool. Prior to you getting into tech, you co founded a yogurt franchise.<\/p>\n Um, how did you get inspired to do that?<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> As everyone does. It\u2019s a very obvious thing [00:04:00] to start a yogurt business. So I moved out to the Bay area after a business school and a stint for a couple of years at Dell. And I reached out to a good friend of mine who had gone to Wharton with, and she said that she was planning to start a business. Asked me if I wanted to, I was really dumb and naive and said, sure.<\/p>\n And so we were brainstorming things that we loved, and we both love, um, healthy food. We\u2019re both really passionate about it. And so we just kind of came up with this idea of a super healthy, super delicious frozen yogurt concept. And it was very, very successful. We were fortunate. And then we expanded it across the Bay Area.<\/p>\n And after a couple of years, I sold it. Uh, and then ended up kind of finding my way and some of my way into technology.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> Super cool. Super cool. Is there any, I\u2019m sure there\u2019s many, but what are some of the standout lessons that you took from the yogurt business into your career in technology?<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> So many. And I think the biggest thing for me is I think of myself as an [00:05:00] entrepreneur. So no matter how big the business I am working in is, um, no matter what position I have, I really take that entrepreneurial mindset with me. And I expect everyone that works for me and that works with me to have that.<\/p>\n And when I mean an entrepreneurial mindset, I mean doing everything and anything to make. your business successful, having a true ownership mentality. And I think that\u2019s actually one of the things that has made me as successful as I\u2019ve been, um, is this idea that I don\u2019t have a job. You know, my job is to make the company successful.<\/p>\n And so whenever I\u2019m asked to take something on, whatever I see, That there\u2019s a whole, when I see there\u2019s a challenge, I just jump into it. I don\u2019t wait to be told. I don\u2019t say that that\u2019s not my job. Um, I see so many people just being really passive, um, or saying like, Hey, that\u2019s somebody else\u2019s role. Like, that\u2019s just not what I believe.<\/p>\n And that\u2019s certainly not the culture that I build on my team. So it\u2019s just that like true ownership mentality, I [00:06:00] think is so important to being successful regardless of the company size.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> Yeah, I love that. And it\u2019s certainly a red thread we see with all our kind of like top performing guests is this idea of, you know, regardless of your role, you are there for one reason only to make the cust The company and your customers successful and you know, it takes wearing many different hats, um, on many different days.<\/p>\n Um, but, uh, I love that. So let\u2019s get right into it. I think kind of 1 of the core things I wanted to chat with you about is, you know, you\u2019ve been part of these 2 incredible unicorn companies in Asana and Calendly. Um, I think my understanding is there was a pretty strong PLG motion, um, out of the gate for both of those companies.<\/p>\n And then along the way. You kind of have to grow up a little bit and start using more, you know, sales led growth tactics, and maybe starting with your time at Asana. [00:07:00] Um, why make that shift? And when should companies start thinking about making that shift?<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> So I\u2019m a marketer, and so I will talk about the customer ad nauseum, so you\u2019ll probably hear me talk about that in every single one of my responses because I really think it\u2019s so important. And why it\u2019s so important is that you can\u2019t just decide to be a PLG business or an SLG business or an SMB business or an enterprise business.<\/p>\n Your go to market motion has to be driven by the product. It has to be driven by what the product can do and the value that the product drives for the customer. And so we saw the same things and same signals at at Asana and at Calendly, which is that we had very strong PLG motions. And the reason we had very strong PLG motions was that the, is that the product is incredibly intuitive and delightful.<\/p>\n It\u2019s a delightful individual user experience. Someone can get value out of it from day [00:08:00] one, which, in my opinion, is one of the most important things. It\u2019s the most important thing for PLG business. But then we saw that people wanted to share it and that there was exponential value and having more people within an organization use it.<\/p>\n And so once that happens, once you have a, an amazing PLG product that all of a sudden can be even better and provide even more value when 10 users have it, when 50 users have it, when 100 users have it, and when they\u2019re reaching out to you, your customers, and saying, Hey, we would love all these additional features.<\/p>\n We would love to have a enterprise agreement. We would love to have a teams agreement. We need extra security features. We need, we need, we need. Then all of a sudden that becomes a great catalyst to say, okay, do we actually want to go up market? Do we want to have an SLG motion? Because that completely changes your company.<\/p>\n And so then you have to make that very conscious decision of okay Are we going to move up market? Are we [00:09:00] going to become a All SLG company or a hybrid or are we going to stick to our PLG route?<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> Yeah. What I\u2019m hearing is almost like. You don\u2019t decide to make the shift your, your customers and your, where your product is at is going to naturally kind of pull you along in, in a direction. Was there any time, whether it was Asana or Calendly where, you know, you had some of this sort of like enterprise demand, they wanted teams, they wanted this functionality, but the PLG is still working so well that you\u2019re like, Oh, maybe we don\u2019t want to, um, divert too many resources.<\/p>\n Like, is there a tipping point, I guess?<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> it\u2019s really hard and there\u2019s no right answer and we absolutely face that at both Calendly and Asana constantly. Most of the decisions that we had to make, most of the discussions we had were around resource allocation. I\u2019d say that that\u2019s absolutely the hardest part of having a hybrid motion is that everything becomes split.<\/p>\n I always say that it\u2019s like having two companies. Because a [00:10:00] enterprise, if you work in marketing, you know that an enterprise marketing motion is wildly different than a PLG marketing motion. So you have to have two marketing teams who have very different skill sets, and you\u2019re almost having to compete with each other for resources.<\/p>\n You also are competing with each other over your website space Because you know what is the thing that you were going to ask people to do? Are you going to ask them to sign up for a demo? You\u2019re gonna ask them to talk to a salesperson You\u2019re gonna ask them to sign up for free and so having to make those really hard decisions around with your very precious real estate What\u2019s the call to action?<\/p>\n That\u2019s just marketing. And then when you think about product and engineering, I mean, talk about scarce resources and prioritization. So, you know, building an enterprise product, building SSO and skim and data analytics and, and permissions. Those are wildly different than building a super usable, intuitive product with all the little features that an individual would want.<\/p>\n And so, We constantly had [00:11:00] to decide, like, what is the right allocation of resources? Is it 50 50? Is it 10? And there\u2019s changed constantly. And then, of course, you\u2019ve got a sales team that is, you know, wants to close six figure deals, and they\u2019re often predicated on promising a feature set to specific customers.<\/p>\n And then you have to decide as a culture, you know, are you going to have engineering teams and product teams that are devoted? to bespoke requests for enterprise customers, which if you are an enterprise company is a no brainer. If you\u2019re a PLG company that also does enterprise, then that further creates like more prioritization, more issues.<\/p>\n So it\u2019s, it\u2019s very difficult, much more difficult than one would think from the outside being like, well, it can\u2019t be that hard. It\u2019s just, it\u2019s. But it is, there\u2019s so many other issues like data warehousing, operations, legal, finance. There\u2019s like just so many [00:12:00] cans of worms that get opened up as you start to think about this.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> Yeah. Yeah. I can imagine. You know, you, you said it\u2019s almost like building two companies. So you\u2019re going to go hire marketers, salespeople that have these two different skill sets. And you know, I imagine in its good form, there\u2019s like healthy competition between those two companies internally. But I imagine it also leads to some, some friction and alignment issues.<\/p>\n Did you battle that at all?<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> All the time, literally all the time. Uh, and I think, you know, I learned so much at Asana. I was able to take that to Calendly right away. So it took me probably two years at Asana to figure out how do we start to bridge the gap? And, um, as I said, I will go back to the customer. What I ultimately realized was that we had to think about the customer first and think about the customer journey.<\/p>\n Because there typically is no SLG without PLG. And I think that\u2019s where people often get a [00:13:00] little bit lost and they don\u2019t see the forest for the trees. So in almost, I\u2019m not going to say everyone, but almost every hybrid company, people find out about the product through some kind of self serve experience.<\/p>\n And so people are interested in getting a thousand person license because they have had some experience with the individual product and you can\u2019t shortcut that as much as we want to. You, you can\u2019t. If, if you have an incredible, like the perfect title at the perfect company, what we often tried to do at first was to force them to talk to a salesperson, even if they wanted to sign up for the product.<\/p>\n You can\u2019t do that. And so really what I brought to Calendly right away was this idea that you have to follow what the customer wants. And so if the customer, no matter how amazing that customer title is, no matter what your data enrichment tells you, if the customer wants to sign up for the product and not talk to a [00:14:00] salesperson, let them do that.<\/p>\n And so we really just focused on trying to make the buying and evaluation process as easy and customer driven as possible. And then look for all the opportunities to segment the customer afterwards and encourage them to upsell, encourage them, expand, encourage them to talk to a salesperson, but you can\u2019t shortcut it to really just, um, validating and honoring what the customer wants just totally makes life so much easier.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Talk me through a little bit about like the. The how and some of the, the tactical execution. So let\u2019s say, you know. A great brand, Coca Cola, you know, you can see that they\u2019ve come and they have 30 people across the organization who are, you know, using Calendly. What kind of data would you look for to then be like, okay, now it\u2019s time.<\/p>\n To flip our [00:15:00] resources to the SLG motion and let\u2019s get a, uh, strategic AE on this one. And like, let\u2019s, let\u2019s go and kind of do some, maybe even outbound into that account and the various, uh, stakeholders walk me through some of that.<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> Yeah, there\u2019s really, we tried so many things and people talk a lot about PQLs and they, most people do it very wrong. Um, and so I would say that there\u2019s two things that we did that worked reasonably well. Um, so number one is looking at the, and PQLs is a reason to call product because they have to be driven by the product.<\/p>\n Everything has to be driven by the product. So one thing that we did quite well, accountably. is we looked at what product signals tended to indicate that somebody was ready to talk to sales. So we kind of did like a reverse, like a reverse engineering and looked and said, okay, when somebody contacted sales, what were typically the things that they did beforehands that led them to be interested?[00:16:00]<\/p>\n And so for example, at Calendly, what we saw was oftentimes when people did a certain type of integration. Okay. That was kind of a signal that they were interested in expansion. And so then we started to build in a true PQL process, which is whenever we saw someone with the right title at the right company who did one of a few different product integrations, we would then send them a personalized email.<\/p>\n It wouldn\u2019t actually be from a salesperson, but it would seem very customized and very personalized from a salesperson and ask them if they would be interested in talking. To a salesperson because we could help them specifically with that integration and with other things related to it. So we gave them something valuable.<\/p>\n We didn\u2019t just say, hey, talk to us, talk to us, want to talk to us now. Like we actually, we gave them a reason to want to talk to a salesperson because we would provide value. Um, and of course we\u2019d have a calendar link right there so they could sign up, you know, to talk to a salesperson right away. That was very successful.<\/p>\n Um, the other thing that we did was we looked [00:17:00] at companies that had have a lot of individual users signing up, and that is by far the best source for large enterprise customers is when you have, you know, as you said, 30 50 100 small teams like licenses, individual users, whether they\u2019re paid or not, but there\u2019s some clear indication that that company has a real need.<\/p>\n And then we would, our sales team would have that information. You know, we would provide it in a, in a data poll. They would reach out to the it person, to a senior person and say, Hey, did you know that there\u2019s 200 people at your company using Calendly, using Asana? This is how we can help you. We can reduce your costs.<\/p>\n We can increase your security. Would you be interested in a call? At the same time, from a marketing perspective, we would surround. Uh, the decision makers with marketing through a B. M. Um, to really kind of create a groundswell and that was quite successful as well.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong>[00:18:00] How did you think about defining your ICP? So I think at like a sauna. You know, there\u2019s a more defined like persona. I think Calendly, it\u2019s one of those blessings and a curse where you can sell into all different parts of the organization, really, like everyone has meetings, everyone needs to schedule their, their day in their life.<\/p>\n Um, how did you refine your personas, your ICP when like you can kind of be everything to everyone, which again can be, can be hard when you think of marketing.<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> Yes, that is such the the greatest part and the Achilles heel of a P. L. G. Business is your customers, everybody, and that is not helpful when you\u2019re a marketer and a salesperson. And so, um, I think really the 2 ways that we looked at it, both at a sauna and a county was both. With industry, which is incredibly important, uh, in a PLGS LG hybrid business, like industry is very, very important in terms of how you can segment, uh, as well, usually as, um, company [00:19:00] size and, um, and type of work.<\/p>\n And so, uh, and function basically function. And so really what we looked at was not users, but we looked at customers that purchase that expanded and retained. And so we just did this very, very thorough analysis of who are the customers from a function perspective, a company size perspective, and an industry perspective that were, you know, the, the best long term customers had the highest LTV had the highest NRR.<\/p>\n Uh, and one of the things we also was actually quite interesting in County was we also saw that there was technology. That, um, that drove that too. So for example, certain, um, Microsoft users were much more likely to integrate Calendly with, with Microsoft for a variety of reasons. And so whenever we had, uh, a certain kind of Microsoft CRM, we knew that that was an incredible sale for us.<\/p>\n Uh, we also knew like [00:20:00] finance was an incredible sale for us, education. So we just. Saw historically, the sales that were easier to close had the highest acbs had the higher expansion retention. Uh, and so I think that that\u2019s really what you have to do over time is ignore the users and really focus on the The money, the dollars.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> Yeah. Yeah. That makes sense. So. Less obsessed with the user or the title of that person and more like, okay, is this a, a style of company in the industry that we know we can drive incredible results for? It\u2019s kind of like zooming out a little bit.<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> Yeah. I\u2019ve seen that a lot. I\u2019ve seen, I\u2019ve seen a lot of companies really focus on users for their ICP, but that\u2019s not that helpful because especially in a PLG business, you typically have. a free trial or you have a free component and it\u2019s great that people are using you. Hopefully they\u2019re spreading it.<\/p>\n Hopefully that gives you some value, but if they\u2019re not paying you, they are not your ICP. Uh, so you [00:21:00] really have to focus on those customers that are paying you. That\u2019s your ICP. And if no one\u2019s willing to pay you, then you have no ICP and you got to think of something else.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> Well said. Well said. I like it. Um, what would you do differently? Let\u2019s say if I could fly you back to your first day at Calendly. Um, what are some of the lessons now looking back that you\u2019re like, Hmm, I wish I could redo that. Or, uh, we would have sped up X, um, if we just knew these one or two things.<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> You know, I think I learned so many lessons at Asana. I actually feel like I did things pretty well at CalME. Um, where I, where it took me way too long at Asana was that merging of the PLG and SLG. When I, cause I had really come from enterprise marketing. And so I just kind of kept the enterprise marketing very separate from the PLG marketing and we had a whole growth team.<\/p>\n They were doing their own [00:22:00] thing. My team was doing our own thing. And it just took way too long for us to realize that it was not about an enterprise customer versus a PLG customer. It was about a customer, and it was about unifying that customer journey that just took way, way, way too long. Um, I will say, uh, actually, now that I think about it, it can\u2019t be.<\/p>\n The one thing that I always wish we could do more of and faster is good data. And, um, it took us a really long time to clean up our data too. We had to overhaul our analytics team. We just didn\u2019t have the right people. And so we were operating without data for a really, really long time. And when we finally got the right reporting in and the right data and it really transformed.<\/p>\n How we sold and how we marketed. And so I always encourage everybody day one have amazing operations, amazing analytics, because you can\u2019t actually do anything without that.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong>[00:23:00] Yeah. How, what did that look like in kind of the real world at Calendly? At Calendly, like what, I think a lot of people probably listening to this podcast are like, Ooh, I know our data isn\u2019t where it\u2019s supposed to be. Um, and it can feel like this overwhelming, daunting overhaul. Um, what are some like small steps, small wins that, uh.<\/p>\n People can do to try and get their data and operations and analytics, you know, back on the right track.<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> Yeah, I mean, data is the most excruciating thing and it\u2019s the least sexy thing, but it\u2019s the most important thing. Um, and, and what happens in this, what happens, this happened to PLGSLG is that two completely different data streams pop up because you\u2019ve got the PLG world and you\u2019ve got, you know, usually an, an iterable, like, you know, some kind of marketing database.<\/p>\n You\u2019ve got a charge beat, like you have like a bunch of. Databases where your P. L. G. Data lives. Um, and then you\u2019ve got [00:24:00] sales force. You\u2019ve got your, uh, all these other data sources where your S. L. G. Liz and they don\u2019t talk to each other. And so that\u2019s, uh, and then you what also happens is that you\u2019ve got your Rev Ops folks.<\/p>\n That, uh, this is super in the weeds, but I spent like six months of my life talking about this at Calendly. You know, you, you have all of these like data labels and data tags that people are creating in a vacuum. And our problem for months and months and months was that we had a bunch of analysts that were just pulling completely wrong data.<\/p>\n Because they didn\u2019t know what this data meant. Everybody was just creating these in a vacuum. Nobody was talking to each other. The data engineers and the analysts, the rev ops folks were all just building completely different databases and there was just no control. And so literally all the reports we were looking at was people just pulling bad data.<\/p>\n And it\u2019s just finally when we brought in this incredible analytics leader, leader, she\u2019s listening. Hello. Uh, and, um, she just like forced everybody to talk to each other. To build a [00:25:00] common source of data, and then we were finally pulling in the right reports. We were finally able to look at the data.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> Yeah, that making sure that you have a unified shared collective like source of truth is so, so, so critical. Um, would, as, as you were making these big kind of overhauls, um, did you have any, uh, kind of leadership meetings that would be focused on this? Like what were kind of. Some of the tactics involved in, in the data overall.<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> One of the best things we did at Calendly was we created these ad hoc committees. And I think that that\u2019s really important is ownership. You can\u2019t just assume that you can get people from 10 different parts of the company to come together and to figure things out. So we created a, um, an operating committee and a governing committee.<\/p>\n And [00:26:00] so the operating committee would have. You know, one representative, like a, a typically a director or a VP level representative from every part of the company that needed to be there. And then we\u2019d have 1 person in charge of the operating committee, and they would be the 1 that convenes them every week, make sure that they have, you know, the, uh, the agenda, make sure that things are moving.<\/p>\n And then our C suite would be the governing committee, and they would meet with us every 2 weeks. And it would be their job to report to us on the progress and we would unblock things and we would make decisions And we tend, we ended up doing that for four to five major issues that we had across the company.<\/p>\n And I\u2019d say that that was a very successful process that I definitely plan to take to meet, take with me in the future. It just created a lot of accountability and visibility, um, and it kept things moving where oftentimes when you say, Oh, there\u2019s, there\u2019s issues go [00:27:00] solve it. There\u2019s no clear leader.<\/p>\n There\u2019s no accountability. There\u2019s no urgency. We really wanted to create urgency.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> Yeah. I like that, that framework a lot. Um, and yeah, I think if you\u2019ve been part of any organization who\u2019s had data struggles, it\u2019s always the thing that gets pushed if there\u2019s no one actually owning it, you\u2019re like, yes, we know we have to figure out all of this stuff, but at the end of the day, I have to hit my number.<\/p>\n I have to hit my lead opportunity goal, my revenue, my pipeline, and we\u2019ll deal with that, that later. So I love this idea of these committees. If people want to steal that, it was You have this operating committee, you have a VP from all these different, you know, business units, um, and then they would basically kind of come up with solutions and then pitch that to the governing committee.<\/p>\n Is that how it Yes. Yeah, exactly. They, they would, I mean, they\u2019re obviously much smarter about these things than I am. I mean, I could never create a solution for a data issue if my life depended on it. [00:28:00] Um, but you know, my, certainly my head of analytics could, and our head of data engineering could. And so their job was to come up with the solutions, but always, obviously there will always be trade offs.<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> And so, you know, our job was to kind of say, okay, given. These constraints, uh, you know, these are two to three options. Which one is the most palatable? Which one do we want to go forward? So really, our job was to make the decision. Also, the reality is it\u2019s not everybody, you know, is, uh, if there were blockers, if there were.<\/p>\n Priorities. That was the really big thing, right? So if we, if they knew that they needed to get two weeks of data engineering time in order to have a fix, but the data engineering team said, Hey, we have all these other priorities we have to work on. Um, our job was to say, well, that\u2019s okay if you don\u2019t work on those priorities or we would help them just figure out how to prioritize, how to unblock, how to get more resources when they just couldn\u2019t make that decision.<\/p>\n They were not empowered. They weren\u2019t able to.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong>[00:29:00] Yeah, yeah. And was there any, uh, incentive structures for these operating committees or does it kind of go back to, hey. It\u2019s entrepreneurial mindset. This is something that is going to help the business. You should, you know, devote time and energy to it. I<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> We are all owners of this company. Their job is to make this company successful.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> it. I like it. Um, so we did a prep call before this. And one thing that you said has been rattling around my head since we had that prep call, cause I think it\u2019s really interesting and I want to talk a little bit about it. And you mentioned this idea of creative destruction in marketing. And I would love for you to kind of explain the, the thinking and idea behind, um, Leveraging creative destruction to, to grow and make sure that you have fresh, new ideas, uh, constantly.<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> Absolutely. So I think it goes back to me being an entrepreneur and wanting to cultivate that mindset. I just believe that there are so many changes and [00:30:00] there are so many new ideas and there\u2019s so many things that we just don\u2019t know, uh, and I have always wanted to encourage my team to be thinking differently, to be innovative, to create something new, to have absolutely no fear about trying new things, uh, because just, just because something works now or doesn\u2019t work now, doesn\u2019t mean that it will be the same a quarter from now or two quarters from now.<\/p>\n The world is changing so insanely fast and every, it doesn\u2019t matter who you are, whether you\u2019re a marketer, engineer, salesperson, you have to change with that. And so everything that I did with my team was encourage them to change almost everything that they did every quarter. So we would have very high level goals for the year.<\/p>\n Um, we\u2019d have clear. Okay. Ours. We\u2019d have, you know, very clear, a very clear path forward of what our strategy was and what we\u2019re going after. But every quarter we would look at all of these sets of activities and tactics, campaigns, channels, um, that we were [00:31:00] doing and we\u2019d have to change most of them, uh, and, uh, whether that was really major, like testing an entire new ad channel, whether that was minor, like, Instead of trying, instead of doing one hour webinar formats, try a five minute webinar format.<\/p>\n Um, it didn\u2019t matter. I just wanted everybody to be looking at everything they were doing and be willing to throw most of it out and try something new.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> I love this idea. And, you know, particularly there\u2019s a lot of driving forces behind it, but obviously with the AI revolution we\u2019re in right now, like literally every week, there\u2019s like a new big announcement that I\u2019m like, Oh my God, this is going to fundamentally change everything. And so if you\u2019ve built a plan that was pre whatever.<\/p>\n Um, would it be fair to say that, you know, your job as a leader was like, okay, we set the, okay. Ours, the, the strategy remains constant, but the tactics are always evolving. Like, [00:32:00] how we get there is going to change every, every quarter, every month,<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> Yeah. There\u2019s a really big difference. between cultivating experimentation and creating chaos. You know, so my, my job was to ensure that everybody felt extremely clear on our goals, our company goals, and how our marketing goals and sales goals ladder up to the company goals. So for example, you know, a year long company goal would be move up market very clear, you know, we, we need to hit.<\/p>\n Uh, 50, 000 enterprise financial services customers this year drive, you know, I\u2019m just making this up drive a hundred million dollars in financial services pipeline. Extremely clear what people need to do. You know, you can\u2019t every month be like, just kidding. We\u2019re not going after enterprise customers. Now we\u2019re going after us and be, you know, retail customers.<\/p>\n So that\u2019s chaos. Can\u2019t do that. You have to have a very clear idea of the customer that segment the [00:33:00] goals. But then all the stuff that people have to do to get there, that\u2019s their job. That\u2019s not my job. So I would never tell people, you know, I want you to try this set of emails, this set of tactics, go after, um, you know, go after the ad campaigns in this way.<\/p>\n Like that\u2019s not my job. Uh, my job was to. Help them understand from a budget perspective. What is available to provide the resources that they need to help prioritize and allocate budget appropriately. And then their job is to figure out every single month, every quarter. What are the new things that they\u2019re going to try?<\/p>\n And then how they\u2019re going to report back to me about what worked and what didn\u2019t work.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> How did you go about fostering the culture of experimentation? I think there\u2019s a trap as companies scale, get bigger. Sometimes the, the type of talent that is maybe, uh, attracted to a larger organization as maybe a little. More risk [00:34:00] averse and, you know, it\u2019s easier just like, Hey, let\u2019s do the thing that we\u2019ve always done.<\/p>\n Cause then I, you know, there\u2019s, there\u2019s no one to blame if it goes wrong, um, versus constantly having that startup mentality. It\u2019s like, no, our job is to be scientists on the marketing team or the, you know, sales team to like always be running experiments and tests so we can optimize and, you know. Get better over time.<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> Yeah, so I would say there\u2019s 2 things that I did that extremely deliberately cultivated environment of kind of trust. and comfort. So number one is I tried very hard to be very, very approachable. I know that sounds silly, but I have very rarely worked for a marketing leader or any kind of leader that was actually very approachable.<\/p>\n And so I do a lot of very deliberate things. So I talk about my family all the time in meetings. I share [00:35:00] pictures of my family. I talk about my weekends, meetings. For me is always about baseball and soccer. Um, I, you know, and so, and I talk a lot about my own Uh, personal times when I have failed, I talk about my vulnerabilities.<\/p>\n So I, I just, I spend a lot of time building trust with my team so that they know me as a person, not just as this random person, three levels above them that they\u2019re scared to talk to. Um, I do, I did, even though I had a very large team. I did skip levels with everybody, um, you know, in either individual settings or group settings.<\/p>\n I put, you know, I had a very open door policy on my calendar. Uh, you know, I just tried as much as I possibly could to be a human being and show them that, you know, they don\u2019t have to be scared of me. Uh, so that\u2019s number one. Um, and I can tell you having worked in many companies. That I was terrified when I had to go and [00:36:00] speak in front of somebody two to three levels above me.<\/p>\n And that is never how I wanted to, to create. That was not the culture I wanted to create. So that\u2019s number one. The second is that, um, in public meetings, like in our all hands, uh, and even in our, my board deck, in other updates to my C level peers, I would talk constantly about the mistakes that we made. I would say, Hey, we tried this campaign.<\/p>\n It didn\u2019t work. This is the reason why this is where we\u2019re going to do differently. And I would share that with my team. Um, and it would be very clear that there was no blame. Uh, and it was just very factual, like not everything is going to work clearly. If everything works, it means you are absolutely not trying hard enough.<\/p>\n And so when people saw that I was very matter of fact about what worked and what didn\u2019t work, it was, it just didn\u2019t didn\u2019t make it. worrisome anymore. They weren\u2019t nervous about it anymore. And so people could come to me and say like, Hey, they tried this thing. It didn\u2019t work. Um, and sometimes people [00:37:00] would really screw up, right?<\/p>\n Sometimes we would send an email out to a hundred thousand people with, uh, you know, dear XX, dear first name. And, um, that happens and it\u2019s happened at every company I\u2019ve been at. And you just, you just say, well, what did we learn from it? And let\u2019s not do it again. What do you, I mean, what are you going to do?<\/p>\n You can\u2019t, people try, people care. I know that they care. And if people make mistakes, they make mistakes. If people screw up, if people run a bad campaign, if people waste money, as long as they\u2019re learning something, as long as they\u2019re trying, I<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> I think that\u2019s a mark of a, a great, great leader is this open door policy, you know, talking openly about your, your mistakes. I think, uh, certainly worked for a lot of leaders to try and hide mistakes or skip over them. And then you\u2019re just robbing your. Team of the lessons that are associated with those those mistakes, um, which is so<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> will tell you one, one story that for me was so powerful. So when I was at Asana, it was when I just joined and you know, it was, I joined during COVID. [00:38:00] So I hadn\u2019t really met anybody else in the team. Everybody else had been there before. I was the only one that had it. And my team had been working for months on this huge launch and, um, and it was the first launch that I and my team had done.<\/p>\n And it was, and it was the first time we were doing the launch and it was the first time I had met the rest of the marketing team in person. So it was all of my marketing peers and our CMO, Dave, who, you know, it\u2019s my boss. And, um, everything that could go wrong in this launch. Went wrong and it was, it was with our CEO and our CRO.<\/p>\n I mean, it just could not have been worse and I\u2019m sitting in this room and I\u2019m so embarrassed because this is the first time that my work had been shown and we\u2019re all sitting there watching the feed freeze and it was so bad and then every, all of my peers started talking about all of the terrible things that had happened to them, all the demos that went wrong, all of the launches that went wrong.<\/p>\n And it was [00:39:00] amazing. And I was like, Oh my gosh, like this is a group of people that care. And this is a group of people that are not going to hold us against me, that we tried something different and new and we screwed up and that just completely changed my whole relationship with all of them. And it made me really comfortable that I could try something and.<\/p>\n Make mistakes and I wasn\u2019t going to get punished for it. So it just, it, it stuck so strongly in my head because it gave me that freedom, uh, to be able to experiment and know that they have my back.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> Yeah, for sure. It\u2019s almost like, uh, some trauma bonding happens when things don\u2019t go the right way. You know, you actually get closer as a team if you\u2019re able to be open and discuss them, you know, freely without. Without fear and there\u2019s, there\u2019s trust built, built in. Um, well, I\u2019m sorry, I\u2019m sorry that happened, but thank you for sharing that, that publicly, uh, because it is<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> Oh my God. To this day, I will never, it was the worst. It was the worst thing [00:40:00] that\u2019s ever happened to me professionally.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> uh, the worst going back to one of the things you said with the high first name, I remember, uh, we did that at outreach and outreach was literally the sales engagement platform. That\u2019s like never, that\u2019s the problem we solve or one of them, you know? Um, so it, it happens to, to everyone. Um, I like it. Okay. I want to go quickly to a founder question.<\/p>\n Um, this one\u2019s super interesting. We just did an episode on, uh, how to look for and identify what makes a great for sales hire. And this is kind of the same thing, except, uh, your first marketer. So this is an early stage founder who sent him this question. So if you\u2019re a founder, let\u2019s say you\u2019re, you know, Pre seed seed stage.<\/p>\n And you\u2019re like, all right, it\u2019s time to invest in, in marketing. Uh, what do you look for in that first hire?<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> Yeah. So I do a lot of advising and consulting, and this is [00:41:00] the number one question that I get. It\u2019s a great question. Uh, so I would say, well, if you ask a hundred marketers who get a hundred answers, but this is, this is my answer. I\u2019d say number one, I would suggest not hiring a marketer until you have product market fit because no matter what you do from a marketing perspective, you can\u2019t market your way into product market fit.<\/p>\n You\u2019re gonna be spending a huge amount of money until wasted money, until you figure out your ICP until you figure out the, the right product for the right person once. And that is a founder\u2019s job. It\u2019s not a marketer\u2019s job. Uh, and so as a founder, when you figure that out, then you can scale it. Don\u2019t try to scale it until you figure that out.<\/p>\n So that\u2019s, in my opinion, I would wait. Uh, so once you have. product market fit. Once you\u2019re thinking about a marketer, what\u2019s really important to understand it\u2019s marketing is totally different than all the other functions. So marketing is extremely [00:42:00] varied. There are five to six different functions in marketing.<\/p>\n They\u2019re all completely different from each other. And there\u2019s not a single marketer on the planet that is an expert in all of them. Um, also marketing at zero to one is very different than one to 10, very different than 10 to a hundred. So you, you\u2019re not going to be able to find a marketer that can do all of those things.<\/p>\n It\u2019s just totally different tactics. And it\u2019s just, it\u2019s, and that, so, um, when I often tell my clients that when you\u2019re looking for a marketer, look for someone that\u2019s going to be with you for two years. If you get someone for more than two years, consider that a bonus, but think about what you need for the next two years.<\/p>\n Don\u2019t worry about scaling. Don\u2019t worry about 50 worry about the next two years. Um, then when you have that, then think about what are your most pressing, pressing issues. Typically, you\u2019re going to have one of two pressing issues. One is you feel like you\u2019ve got a really good handle on your message and your narrative.<\/p>\n Uh, and really what you need to do is build pipeline. And that then [00:43:00] you\u2019re going to look for someone that has expertise in demand gen. The other pressing issue you might have is actually your pipeline looks pretty good. Your user generation looks pretty good, but you don\u2019t really have a good handle on your narrative and your differentiation.<\/p>\n So then you\u2019re going to look for someone with product marketing experience. So that\u2019s, that\u2019s kind of how I would look at it, which is what\u2019s your most pressing need? Find someone with that experience because you\u2019re not going to be able to find somebody that has all the different experiences that you need.<\/p>\n Um, and just recognize what you are giving up to get that expertise and be okay with it.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> Yeah. Yeah. I like that. I think that\u2019s a great way of looking at it. And I like this idea of. Just looking for someone for the next two years. I think it feels like such a monumental hire. Like, Ooh, the first sales hire, first marketing hire. And you\u2019re like, Oh, I want this person to be our VP one day and they\u2019re going to grow and they\u2019re going to be with us for this whole time.<\/p>\n And in reality, you know, their jobs [00:44:00] required different skillsets as, as you scale, you know? Um, and so I think<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> Yeah. And don\u2019t consider it a failure. Yeah. Don\u2019t consider it a failure if they only make it a year, a year and a half, if they provided value. Hopefully they will. It\u2019s totally fine. And like, you\u2019re just going to need somebody for that next step. And that next step, you know, getting from what you need at 5 million is definitely different than 25 million is definitely different.<\/p>\n 50 at a hundred, 500. And that\u2019s totally fine.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> Yeah. Yeah. Building on this question a little bit is. I would love to hear your take on when folks should start investing in brand. I think that\u2019s become more and more important. Even some of the startups we see now out there, even quite early stage, you like you\u2019ve heard of them and they have great, great brands.<\/p>\n Is it? Ever too early to invest in brand because it can be quite a expensive, uh, endeavor, but looking at Asana, Calendly, like those brands are [00:45:00] household names. Um, when do you think startups should start investing in brand?<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> think there is a big misnomer that investing in your brand means. Billboards and TV campaigns, you know, Asana and Calendly had years and years and years and years before they spent a dime on marketing and Calendly was a household name before it spent any money on marketing, before it had a marketing team.<\/p>\n So I think your brand is really a reflection on all of the elements that make your company known and valuable to customers. And so investing in your brand could also mean just having an amazing product, having a super viral product, having great customer support, having great communities, having people that love you and talk about you having great reviews.<\/p>\n Like those are all things that you can do to build your brands without spending any money or very little money. And so I would say from day one, you should invest in your brand in those ways in building a [00:46:00] company that people love and want to support and want to share and talk about. And then typically what people think about more traditional brand spend, it\u2019s often in relation to something else, some external force.<\/p>\n So maybe competitors have come in. Maybe you feel like you are on the precipice. Of something really big, like, okay, there\u2019s a market shift and we think that we can really gain a lot of market share and we have to really go in heavily. Um, oftentimes it\u2019s a repositioning of the company. It\u2019s launching a big new product.<\/p>\n You have to reach new people. That\u2019s how I would typically think about when it might make sense to do a big brand campaign is when you\u2019re ready to accelerate or transform the way that people think about your company.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> Yeah. Yeah, that makes makes total sense. Almost like investing in brand is really just investing the right dollars into product and your customer and making them successful. And then they become, you know, your brand [00:47:00] advocates. It\u2019s not all about just big flashy PR campaigns or, you know, investing in a Super Bowl commercial.<\/p>\n Uh, it\u2019s kind of<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> I can\u2019t tell you the number of, yeah, I can\u2019t tell you the number of times that I have seen an advertisement, seen an article, uh, about a company I\u2019ve been intrigued. And then I go and I look at their reviews and they\u2019re terrible and I don\u2019t buy it. Right. So it, everything has to be about the product first before spending money on the marketing.<\/p>\n If your reviews are not good, people are not going to buy your product. If your word of mouth is not good, people are not going to buy it. So focus on that.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> Yeah, I think that\u2019s great. Great advice. Um, well, this has been an awesome conversation. I have 2 final questions for you. Uh, and I appreciate you hanging out with me today. Uh, the 1st question, I call it the silver bullet question. Um, I say it almost every episode, but. Most of us know there are no silver bullets.<\/p>\n Unfortunately, I really wish there were, [00:48:00] um, people look for them anyway. Uh, what is one tactic or strategy that\u2019s working for you or the companies that you\u2019re serving, uh, like today?<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> Yeah, I mean, we\u2019re moving all of our budget from PR a lot from Google to social. It is astonishing over the past couple of years, how much, uh, value you can get out of both organic and paid social, particularly micro influencers. And so these are even for B2B companies, influencers on TikTok, on Instagram, YouTube, LinkedIn.<\/p>\n Uh, a ridiculous, uh, amount of value from Reddit, uh, and you can, there\u2019s actually even Reddit SEO experts. Uh, so I would say that if you are just starting out, really focus on your social influencer strategy. It is, it\u2019s going to really significantly pay [00:49:00] dividends.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> Yeah, it\u2019s a great, a great call out. And I think we saw Clay run this playbook pretty, pretty well. Um, I know they were out there like engaging all these different social influencers within kind of the sales and, and GTM realm. Um, It\u2019s funny you bring up Reddit. I keep hearing, I keep hearing about Reddit, um, from so many people, just like recently within, I think the last like two, three months, um, any learnings you can share from Reddit, the platform I\u2019ve, I\u2019ve never been a part of a marketing team or, um, or anyone that\u2019s invested in that, that channel.<\/p>\n So I\u2019m just kind of curious.<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> Yeah, I mean, the reason, at least in my opinion, the reason that it\u2019s become so much more valuable is that if you Google a company or if you Google a concept, Reddit appears among the top results. So it has just shot up in terms of the importance. So not only is Reddit itself a massive, has a massive [00:50:00] user base and tons of engagement, But when you\u2019re searching for something on Google, instead of it showing, you know, a company\u2019s results or other review sites, it\u2019s showing Reddit.<\/p>\n So it\u2019s almost becoming a de facto review site. And there\u2019s just a lot of very Impassioned people on Reddit, uh, and they go, it.<\/p>\n yes, trying to be diplomatic. Um, but they also, they, they go into a lot of detail, so there\u2019s a lot of depth around it. And so it\u2019s almost like you\u2019re getting a, like a review, um, and a series of reviews and there\u2019s multiple different angles.<\/p>\n And so I think it\u2019s just a place that people feel like they\u2019re going to get an unbiased. review of, you know, an industry products. Um, but you can feed and you can source, uh, you, you can sort of, uh, infuse certain topics and certain subreddits by with [00:51:00] yourself. having other people asking your customers to chime in.<\/p>\n So there are just lots, it really is like SEO, but specifically for Reddit. So I would say that that, and also being really responsive when you see people with a negative review jumping in and really trying to be helpful. Well,<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> I think I\u2019m going to, you\u2019ve inspired me to go deep on, on Reddit marketing. Um, so that\u2019s going to be my, my, my homework, uh, for the next little while. Cause it\u2019s so interesting. Right. It\u2019s also like, yeah, the anonymous component to it is very interesting. Cause you can. Have almost like sub brands that might be kind of part of your brand that are like engaging the community and it doesn\u2019t seem as, um, bias, I guess, if you were just to like, respond as Calendly or Asana, um, which I think is cool.<\/p>\n Um, all right. Final final question is, uh, what is one widely [00:52:00] held belief that CMOs, CROs, uh, Still believe to be true that you think is bullshit or no longer serving us<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> So I am, I\u2019m very surprised that I still interact with C level folks who think that there is a very clean, Customer journey and that it is like an assembly line where you start with marketing and marketing drives leads and then they kind of throw it over the fence to sales and sales close it and they throw it over the fence and customer support and then poor customer support is the one dealing with all of the existing customers and then their job is to do all the retention and it\u2019s nobody else\u2019s job at that point.<\/p>\n Um, I just can\u2019t, that is not something that I have, I have actually seen over many, many years. be how customers think and how, and how we should all interact. Um, so in my opinion, like we are all as company, everybody is responsible for the customer. And it is a twisty, tangly, super interwoven, messy customer [00:53:00] journey.<\/p>\n That requires everybody to think about how do you act, how do you acquire customers? How do you sell to them and how do you retain them? Um, and to me worrying about attribution, worrying about credit. Uh, is very, very silly, and ultimately it\u2019s about how does everybody collectively hit the number? And if that means that marketing stops driving leads because they need to focus on retention and upsell, then let\u2019s do that.<\/p>\n If that means customer support has to be selling up front to customers, like let\u2019s do that. Um, but again, going back to being an entrepreneur and that entrepreneurial spirit, it\u2019s. Everybody\u2019s role to think about the customer from beginning to end.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> great call out and I will tell you When I was an operator attribution was the bane of my existence I just always wanted to do the thing and not like look back too much and make who gets credit for the thing So much wasted [00:54:00] time and energy can be like sometimes it\u2019s up to like 30 percent of people\u2019s job It\u2019s just proving what they\u2019re doing is having an impact which I think it\u2019s just incredible Waste of, of resources, but in, it\u2019s always a balance, right?<\/p>\n How did you, cause you need attribution for knowing what\u2019s working, what to double down on, what was that kind of balance for, for you of like, Hey, we all have shared goals. We\u2019re driving towards them. We need at least enough data so we can make informed decisions, but we don\u2019t want to slow people down with this attribution mess.<\/p>\n How did you think about it?<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> Yeah. So what I would do is, is I would always, I think number one thing is building trust between marketing and sales and customer support. So if you all trust each other and value each other and recognize that you\u2019re all doing the right thing, have shared goals. have shared like an understanding of what\u2019s working or not, then attribution doesn\u2019t really matter because you\u2019ve all agreed that these are the things that you\u2019re going to do.<\/p>\n Where I find other [00:55:00] problems is when marketing, which is like 99 percent of the time, creates all of their campaigns in a, in a silo and then just throws them over the fence in sales. And then complains and sales doesn\u2019t, you know, follow up on leads or whatever. And then sales is complaining that marketing doesn\u2019t listen to them.<\/p>\n Then of course, everything breaks down and there\u2019s no trust. And then you start fighting about attribution. But if you all like believe the same things, and if you\u2019ve all agreed on the plan together, then if something, if you don\u2019t hit your numbers, it\u2019s because all of you made the wrong call and it doesn\u2019t matter whether, you know, marketing isn\u2019t delivering or sales and the bottom of the leads, you all are in it together.<\/p>\n And so I think fundamentally that\u2019s absolutely number one, which is you build a shared plan. The sales team has 100 percent input into all the campaigns that you\u2019re going to run. All the things that you\u2019re going to do, all of your goals, they see your numbers, it\u2019s super transparent, you\u2019ve all agreed on the assumptions, um, and then you just build the plan together and you operate the plan together.<\/p>\n Uh, and so that\u2019s, and when I look at data, I am, as you [00:56:00] said, I\u2019m not looking at attribution. I couldn\u2019t care less whether marketing drives 50 percent and sales drives 50%. Who cares? Um, especially in this world where so much of it is about. Uh, a customer hitting, you know, hitting you up 10 times, 15 times.<\/p>\n They\u2019re doing so much before they\u2019re willing to contact sales. Also in this world where expansion is as important as the initial sale, like then marketing never gets credit for that and who cares? But if you\u2019re doing all the right things and that\u2019s what your data should show you, like are the campaigns that you\u2019re running, are they influencing?<\/p>\n You know, are people engaging with them? Are they interacting with them? Are people coming to your webinars? Are people clicking on ads? Are the right people seeing them? You know, if you run an ad, an ABM campaign, are those customers eventually reaching out and upselling it? Those are the things that matter.<\/p>\n And you can look and say, yeah, like what we\u2019re doing is valuable because we are touching customers in some way that\u2019s eventually causing them to buy from us. [00:57:00] That that\u2019s Yeah, only thing that matters.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> totally. I love that way of way of thinking. Do you think it was? easier for you to think that way since you, uh, had the CMO and CRO title, you could kind of see the whole picture. And I imagine that drove, uh, alignment from the very top down.<\/p>\n Jessica Gilmartin:<\/strong> Yeah, but even before, you know, even when we had our CRO before I took over. We had that mentality and I was very fortunate that she was someone that was interested in building that kind of relationship that understood that that was really important. Um, and I think that that\u2019s, you know, and I think having that strong relationship with CRO, having the strong relationship with the CFO and the CEO, having that buy in across the organization, um, and a lot of that just took a lot of communication around our plan, getting a lot of buy in.<\/p>\n I just see so many CMOs who are very defensive and very closed off. And who take everything so personally, and who don\u2019t want, um, any kind of input [00:58:00] and they like, they just want their goal. They just want like, I, I want to be able to drive 40 percent of leads and that\u2019s it. And like, that\u2019s my goal. That\u2019s not going to make you successful.<\/p>\n And so just being really open and focused on what\u2019s best for the company, uh, I think will serve you well. And building that bridge with the CRO is going to be really critical for you.<\/p>\n Scott Barker:<\/strong> I like it. I like it. Well, I think that is a great place to end. Uh, Jessica, thank you again for the conversation. Um, if listeners want to follow along with, with what you\u2019re doing, um, are you an X person, LinkedIn person? What\u2019s, uh, the best way to follow, I am definitely not an ex person. So LinkedIn. LinkedIn. LinkedIn.<\/p>\n Perfect. Um, well, again, thank you. And to all our listeners, appreciate you hanging out with us. I, I say it every week, but, uh, you know, listening is one thing, executing something totally different. Hopefully you take some of these ideas, strategies, and tactics and implement them in your own business. And we will see you all [00:59:00] next week.\u00a0<\/p>\n The post GTM 136: How Asana & Calendly Scaled: PLG to SLG Playbooks That Work | Jessica Gilmartin<\/a> appeared first on GTMnow<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The GTM Podcast is available on any major directory, including: Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube Jessica…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":278,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-442","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-sales"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.hudsonpcrepair.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/442","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.hudsonpcrepair.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.hudsonpcrepair.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.hudsonpcrepair.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.hudsonpcrepair.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=442"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.hudsonpcrepair.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/442\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":443,"href":"http:\/\/www.hudsonpcrepair.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/442\/revisions\/443"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.hudsonpcrepair.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/278"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.hudsonpcrepair.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=442"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.hudsonpcrepair.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=442"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.hudsonpcrepair.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=442"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Discussed in this Episode:<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\n
Highlights:\u00a0<\/strong><\/h2>\n
\n\n
\n
\n
\n<\/li>\n
The GTM Podcast is a weekly podcast hosted by Scott Barker, GTMfund Partner, featuring interviews with the top 1% GTM executives, VCs, and founders. Conversations reveal the unshared details behind how they have grown companies, and the go-to-market strategies responsible for shaping that growth.<\/p>\n
\nGTM 136 \u2013 Jessica Gilmartin<\/strong><\/h2>\n
The importance of having good data and what it takes to get that data<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Cultivating a Culture of Approachability and Creativity<\/strong><\/h2>\n